- ISBN13: 9780470170724
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Product Description
A fascinating collection of ten high-profile cases illustrating the controversial, often contentious-yet essential-role of forensic psychology in the American justice system Written by psychologist and lawyer Charles Patrick Ewing, one of the country’s leading experts on forensic psychology, Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook is a scholarly, thought-provoking collection of cases from the author’s three decades of professional experience. Bringing t… More >>
Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook
Tags: Casebook, Forensic, Psychologist, Trials
#1 by anonymous1 on April 7, 2010 - 5:59 am
My order was cancelled because “quality control” determined I was not actually sent the item and they were not able to locate another copy to send to me.
Rating: 1 / 5
#2 by Karen Franklin on April 7, 2010 - 8:04 am
Ewing, a Distinguished Service Professor at the State University of New York’s law school in Buffalo, employs the same case study format from Minds on Trial: Great Cases in Law and Psychology, this time using only cases in which he has been involved over his 30-year career as an expert witness. The book is well written and packed with details and lengthy segments of trial transcripts from ten riveting, high-profile cases, making it ideal for use as a teaching tool for students of mental health law or the social sciences.
My lengthier review, in California Lawyer magazine, is online at tiny.cc/Ewing.
Rating: 5 / 5
#3 by Martin P. McCarthy on April 7, 2010 - 10:36 am
Charles Patrick Ewing’s new book, “Tales of a Forensic Scientist” is another treat. Ewing’s prose is engaging and witty – written in plain English but in no way is it dummy-downed.
Ewing uses 10 cases in which he was called as an expert witness to illustrate both the benefits and the limits of expert testimony. Indeed, in every case in which he testified as an expert for the defense, the defense was unsuccessful at trial. His purpose in using some of these “losing cases,” was not to show that he is unsuccessful as an expert witness. To the contrary, though his testimony had not achieved results at trial, it had collateral benefits in the sentences in the cases of Charlene Brundidge, Judith Neeley and (possibly) Felicia Morgan.
As a lawyer and a forensic psychologist, Ewing aptly describes the differing purposes between the two. A lawyer is an advocate while a forensic psychologist is (supposed to be) a neutral and detached professional. Ewing’s bias is decidedly against the expert witness” who acts as advocate (the hired gun). Ewing minces no words in expressing his disdain for the “hired gun.” For Ewing, the “hired gun” does a disservice to whatever field he may be testifying. This is not Ewing’s first foray into the criticism of the “hired gun (Insanity: Murder, Madness, and the Law). The words of W.B. Yeats come to mind, “But was there ever dog that praised his fleas?”
According to Ewing, too much significance is attached to the testimony of the expert witness. Even when the expert (such as Ewing) renders a dispassionate reasoned opinion, he can still lose the “battle of the experts” to a hack hired gun.
Rating: 5 / 5